FANDOM


Super Canon

Dragon Ball canon is officially defined with the inclusion of Super in 2018.

Dragon Ball canon was first officially defined during the Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour in an exhibit called the History of Dragon Ball.

As of the start of this tour on November 1, 2018, the official canon of Dragon Ball includes Akira Toriyama's original Dragon Ball manga (which composes both Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z in the West) and the Dragon Ball Super manga, which has its story written by Toriyama and artwork drawn by Toyotarō.[1]

Additionally, despite not being adapted by the Dragon Ball Super manga as Dragon Ball Z: God and God was, Toriyama has confirmed that the events of Dragon Ball Z: Revival of "F" are a canonical continuation of his manga, as well.[2] He also considers the Jaco the Galactic Patrolman manga and its extra chapter, Dragon Ball Minus, to be connected to his series.[3]

Canon Story Arcs

During the History of Dragon Ball exhibit at the Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour, official names were given for each of the canon story arcs in both the Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Super manga.

Dragon Ball

  1. Hunt for the Dragon Balls Arc
  2. Kame-Sennin Training Arc
  3. 21st Tenka-Ichi Budōkai Arc
  4. Red Ribbon Army Arc
  5. Uranai Baba Arc
  6. 22nd Tenka-Ichi Budōkai Arc
  7. Piccolo Daimaō Arc
  8. 23rd Tenka-Ichi Budōkai Arc
  9. Saiyan Arc
  10. Freeza Arc
  11. Androids Arc
  12. Cell Arc
  13. High School Arc
  14. 25th Tenka-Ichi Budōkai Arc
  15. Majin Boo Arc

Dragon Ball Super

  1. Hakaishin Beerus Arc
  2. Hakaishin Champa Arc
  3. "Future" Trunks Arc
  4. Universe Survival Arc
  5. Unnamed Fifth Arc (November 2018)[1]

Akira Toriyama and Dragon Ball Canon

Akira Toriyama is the original creator and author of the Dragon Ball manga. Over the years, Toriyama has made numerous claims about the canon status of various medias set within his franchise. It is clear from these comments—and from others, in which he derides both the Japanese and English anime adaptations for their portrayal of Son Gokū—that he defines the canon of Dragon Ball as being in relation to his original manga.

On the Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z movies, Toriyama stated:

I take the movies as “stories in a different dimension from the main story of the comic”. I’m entirely just an audience member for them.

—Akira Toriyama, Daizenshū 7 Interview


On Dragon Ball Z: God and God and Dragon Ball Z: Revival of "F", Toriyama stated that:

[As with the last movie], I thought up the new story for the next Dragon Ball theatrical film as though it were a continuation of the manga when it was in serialization.

—Akira Toriyama, V-Jump (2014)


However, in November 2018, Toei Animation and Shueisha Publishing Co., Ltd. confirmed during the Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour that the Dragon Ball Super manga, for which Toriyama was responsible for only the story and character designs, was canon to Toriyama's manga.[1]

Canon and the Extended Universe

The Dragon Ball franchise consists of a vast variety of media including various anime, films, video games, and even other manga series. This can make it difficult to discern the canonicity of certain content. However, as of the Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour's History of Dragon Ball exhibit, it is confirmed that only the Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Super manga, with the addition of Revival of "F", Jaco the Galactic Patrolman, and Dragon Ball Minus, are considered canon to Toriyama's franchise.

Anime and Canon

The Dragon Ball anime, Dragon Ball Z, Dragon Ball Z Kai, and Dragon Ball Super anime all adapt content from their respective manga series. As a result, the adapt and depict canon content. However, they also depict original content that falls outside the preview of canon (i.e., the Garlic Junior Arc).

Anime series like Dragon Ball GT have been treated as sequels to the Dragon Ball franchise, but are not, in fact, official sequels to Akira Toriyama's manga.[4][5] Other anime series, like the Dragon Ball Heroes anime are purely promotional material for its corresponding video game franchise and are not meant to be interpreted as official continuations of Toriyama's manga.

Films and Canon

With the exceptions of God and God and Revival of "F," which Akira Toriyama declared to be official continuations of his manga,[2] movies are considered to be different stories set in other dimensions.[6] As a result, Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Z animated films are not considered canonical.

Games and Canon

While games frequently adapt canon content, they are not in anyway meant to be considered canonical. This includes Dragon Ball Online, which, unlike most video games, was heavily worked upon by Akira Toriyama, but was never officially released outside of Korea.

Canon and Dragon Ball GT

The canon status of Dragon Ball GT has been an issue of contentious debate among the Dragon Ball fan community. As both Dragon Ball and Dragon Ball Super proceed the story of Dragon Ball GT by many years, there are no direct contradictions with the story of GT.

Akira Toriyama had the following to say about the anime-only adaptation:

Being a lazy bum by nature, I was absurdly happy when I managed to safely finish up Dragon Ball’s serialization, and finally be released from Deadline Hell. The TV anime people wanted to continue for just a little bit more, but I [just couldn’t do] any more than that… And so, I left the Dragon Ball anime completely up to the anime staff, story and all. That was Dragon Ball GT.... Dragon Ball GT is a grand side-story of the original Dragon Ball, and it’ll make me happy for us to watch and enjoy it together.

—Akira Toriyama, Dragon Ball GT DVD Box: Dragon Box GT “Dragon Book” (15 June 2005)


Furthermore, GT is the Dragon Ball media with the least amount of involvement from Toriyama. Toriyama himself only came up with the title for the series, designed the main cast and their vehicles, and he drew a few pictures for the series.[7]

As a result of these facts in conjunction with its exclusion from the Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour's History of Dragon Ball exhibit, Dragon Ball GT is not considered canon to the Dragon Ball manga.[1]

Reference Books and Canon

Reference books, like the Daizenshū series, often expand upon content that is not touched upon or fully explained in the anime, films, or the manga. However, like the aforementioned Daizenshū series of databooks, most Dragon Ball reference books are anime reference books and have little to no involvement from Akira Toriyama himself. Therefore, they are supplemental to the anime, but are not considered to be canonical.[8]

However, there are exceptions. An example of this is the Dragon Ball Volume "F" which was written by Toriyama himself and is supplemental material to Dragon Ball Z: Revival of "F", itself one of the few canonical films in the franchise.

Notes and references

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Tokyo Skytree + Viz North America Tour 2018-2019
  2. 2.0 2.1 V-Jump (2014)
  3. V-Jump December Issue Special Project: “Tera-P”
  4. TwitterLogo @Herms98 (Todd Frankenship) on Twitter "This is the same wall display Viz translated, right? In which case it seems the Japanese phrasing for "canon sequel" is 正統続編, if that hadn't been established already. You could also translate it as "proper sequel" or "legitimate sequel". I think translating it as "canon sequel" is reasonable, if only because that's how those concepts are typically phrased in English these days. That is, it's not like Shueisha and/or Toei suddenly started using the word "canon". Rather, they said "this is a legit sequel" (in slightly fancy marketing copy language) and that got translated into English using the word "canon" because that's how English fandom talks. While GT is typically called a 続編, to my knowledge it's never been referred to as a 正統続編 the way Super is here."
  5. Dragon Ball GT DVD Box: Dragon Box GT “Dragon Book” (15 June 2005)
  6. Daizenshū 7 Interview
  7. Dragon Ball GT DVD Box: Dragon Box GT “Dragon Book” (15 June 2005)
  8. Toriyama’s Contributions to the Anime

Start a Discussion Discussions about Canon

  • Dealing With Canon

    30 messages
    • Think again, I keep my headcanon on my own but not being quite against Ten's solution if there's a compromise among the community.
    • Hump. If any materials been retconed, cut from canon, not-yet become official,..., should them fall under "Behind the Scenes" sect...
  • Cannonicity of Dragon Ball Online

    7 messages
    • It is not canon, for sure. 
    • By that mentioned reasons, we can consider DBO as non-canon like some movies, I mean, canon in the alternate timeline. It hurted me when NO G...